Postmodern Music Discourse 

後現代音樂論述

 

InstructorYuh-wen Wang

SemesterFall 2003

Credit3

 

Introduction

 

Music discourse has been influenced by postmodern thinking in fields such as architecture, literary criticism, cultural criticism, etc. in the recent decade. More and more writings about music can be found that reflect such interest. They may be related to various topics, such as unity/disunity, music autonomy, music narrativity and narratology, gender study, politics of musical composition and performance, social and cultural criticism, the music aesthetic and sociological concept of Adorno and other Frankfurt school scholars, cultural plurality and relativism, and the study of canon.

 

This course explores how music is discussed in the postmodern era. There are at least two basic directions to be considered: (1) discussion and exploration of the so-called

“postmodern music”; and (2) postmodern critique and discussion of musical compositions. Regarding the second direction, one may find (A) music theoretical writings to be applied generally to a group of compositions, and (B) analysis, interpretation and critique of individual composition(s). These directions and areas form the main outline if this course.

 

Since the amount of writings under this definition of postmodern music discourse is tremendous, what is chosen to read in this course only reflects s small portion of what the instructor deems important in this direction.

 

Content

 

1. Postmodern musical style: what kinds of music, what styles and composers are considered to be “postmodern”? What is postmodern musical style defined or described?

 

2. Analytical and critical method of multimedia musical works: Use of multiple media is one of the features of postmodern music. Although there has been many investigation on multimedia works, such as films and MTVs, few concentrate upon the analytical or critical method of music in such works. In this regard, Nicholas Cook’s recent book Analyzing Music Multimedia offers a theoretical framework and groundwork.

 

3. How music is listened, considered, discussed and criticized under the postmodern thought: This is a huge area, even the topics of which cannot possibly be exhausted in this course. What is done in this course is simply choose one or two topics for discussion. In this course the selected topic will be politics of music—how musical composition, performance and reception relate to the political situation of various groups.

 

Evaluation

 

class discussion 40%; final report 60%

Final report includes two formats: oral and written. Students should discuss their topics and outlines with the instructor in order to choose a proper topic and make a proper outline.

 

Main Reference:

 

Bohlman, Philip. “Musicology as a Political Act,” Journal of Musicology 11 (1993): 411-36.

Cook, Nicholas. Analysing Musical Multimedia. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

----------. “Music Theory and the Postmodern Muse: An Afterword,” Concert Music, Rock, & Jazz Since 1945: Essays and Analytical Studies, ed. by Elizabeth West Marvin and Richard Herman. University of Rochester Press, 1995; pp. 422-39.

---------- and Mark Everist, eds. Rethinking Music. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Cusick, Susanne . “Of Women, Music and Power: A Model from Seicento Florence,” Musicology and Difference De la Motte-Haber, Helga. “Postmodernism in Music: Retrospection as Reassessment,” Contemporary Music Review 12 (1995), pp. 77-83.

Everist, Mark. “Reception Theories, Canonic Discourses, and Musical Value,” in Nicholas Cook & Everist, eds. Rethinking Music, pp. 378-402.

Kramer, Jonathan. “Beyond Unity: Toward an Understanding of Musical Postmodernism,” in Concert Music, Rock, and Jazz Since 1945: Essays and Analytical Studies, ed. by Elizabeth West Marvin and Richard Herman. University of Rochester Press, 1995.

Tomlinson, Gary. Music in Renaissance Magic. University of Chicago Press, 1993.

Treitler, Leo. “Postmodern Signs in Musical Studies,” Journal of Musicology 13/1 (1995)

----------, “Gender and Other Dualities of Music History,” in Ruth A. Solie, ed. Musicology and Difference; pp. 23-45.

Van den Toorn, Peter C. Music, Politics, and the Academy. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1995.

 

Other Reference

 

Abbate, Carolyn. Unsung Voices: Opera and Musical Narrative in the Nineteenth Century. Princeton University Press, 1991.

Attali, Jacques. Noise: the Political Economy of Music. Brian Massumi, trans. Minneapolis, MN, 1985 (Translation of Bruits: essai sur l’économie politique de la musique, 1977).

Bergeron, Katherine & Philip Bohlman, eds. Disciplining Music: Musicology and Its Canons. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

Dennis, David B. Beethoven in German Politics, 1870-1989. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996.

Eyerman, Ron & Andrew Jamison. Music and Social Movements: Mobilizing Traditions in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Frith, Simon, ed. World Music, Politics, and Social Change: Papers from the International Association for the Study of Popular Music. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 1989.

Fulcher, Jane F. The Nation’s Image: French Grand Opera as Politics and Politicized Art. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Goehr, Lydia. The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works: An Essay in Philosophy of Music. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.

----------. The Quest for Voice: Music, Politics, and the Limits of Philosophy. Oxford:

Clarendon Press, 1998.

Lipsitz, George. Dangerous Crossroads: Popular Music, Postmodernism, and the Poetics of Place. London: Verso, 1994.

McClary, Susan. Conventional Wisdom: the Content of Musical Form. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.

Nehring, Neil. Popular Music, Gender, and Postmodernism: Anger Is an Energy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1997.

Norris, Christopher. Music and the Politics of Culture. New York: St Martin’s Press, 1989.

Pratt, Ray. Rhythm and Resistance: Explorations in the Political Uses of Popular Music. New York: Praeger, 1990.

Rowe, David. Popular Cultures: Rock Music, Sport and the Politics of Pleasure. London: Sage Publications, 1995.

Said, Edward. Musical Elaborations. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.

Schwarz, David, Anahid Kassabian & Lawrence Siegel, eds. Keeping Score: Music,

Disciplinarity, Culture. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia, 1997.

Solie, Ruth A. Musicology and Difference: Gender and Sexuality in Music Scholarship.

Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1993.

----------. “What Do Feminists Want? A Reply to Pieter van den Toorn,” Journal of Musicology IX/4 (1991), pp. 400-410.

Stockfelt, Ola. “Adequate Modes of Listening,” trans. by Anabid Kassabian and Leo G. Svendsen in David Schwarz, Anahid Kassabian & Lawrence Siegel, eds. Keeping Score: Music, Disciplinarity, Culture, pp. 129-46.

Subitnik, Rose Rosengard. Developing Variations: Style and Ideology in Western Music. Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.

----------. Deconstructive Variations: Music and Reason in Western Society. Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.

Weber, William. The Rise of Musical Classics in Eighteenth-Century England: A Study in Canon, Ritual, and Ideology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.

Weiner, Marc A. Undertones of Insurrection: Music, Politics & the Social Sphere in the Modern German Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1993.

 

NB: There are other important readings which are not included here, such as writings by Lawrence Kramer and McClary. Because some of them have been discussed in other courses, they will not be assigned in this course. However, they may still be discussed during the class, especially when they are mentioned in the assigned reading (for example, in Leo Treitler’s “Postmodern Signs,” Van den Toorn’s Music, Politics & the Academy).

 

In addition, many discussions of pop music is related to postmodernism. Because they often involve pop culture, they should be treated in a separate course, and is not included in this course.

Syllabus

 

Weeks 1-4

Kramer, Jonathan. “Beyond Unity: Toward an Understanding of Musical Postmodernism,” in Concert Music, Rock, and Jazz Since 1945: Essays and Analytical Studies, ed. By Elizabeth West Marvin and Richard Herman. University of Rochester Press, 1995.

----------. “The Nature and Origins of Musical Postmodernism,” Current Musicology

----------. “Can Modernism Survive George Rochberg?” Critical Inquiry 11 (1984), pp. 341-54.

Rochberg, George. “Can Art Survive Modernism?” Critical Inquiry 11 (1984), pp.317-40.

Pasler, Jan. “Postmodernism, Narrativity, and the Art of Memory,” De la Motte-Haber, Helga. “Postmodernism in Music: Retrospection as Reassessment,” Contemporary Music Review 12 (1995), pp. 77-83.

 

Weeks 5-8

Cook, Nicholas. Analysing Musical Multimedia. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Preface & Introduction to Part I: Music and Meaning in the Commercials (pp. v-xi, 1-23)

 

Weeks 9-12

Edwards, George. “Music and Postmodernism,” Partisan Review 58/4 (1991), pp. 693-706.

Treitler, Leo. “Postmodern Signs in Musical Studies,” Journal of Musicology 13/1 (1995)

Cook, Nicholas. “Music Theory and the Postmodern Muse: An Afterword,” Concert Music, Rock, & Jazz Since 1945, pp. 422-39.

 

Weeks 13-16

Van den Toorn, Peter C. Music, Politics, and the Academy. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1995.Introduction

Treitler, Leo. “Gender and Other Dualities of Music History,” in Ruth A. Solie, ed. Musicology and Difference; pp. 23-45.

Cusick, Susanne . “Of Women, Music and Power: A Model from Seicento Florence,”

Musicology and Difference Bohlman, Philip. “Musicology as a Political Act,” Journal of Musicology 11 (1993): 411-36.